[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSgqRAF6Ih8u6fdP@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 12:39:00 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@...zon.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: selftests: test userfaultfd minor for
guest_memfd
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 04:49:46PM +0000, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
> On 25/11/2025 18:38, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@...zon.com>
> >
> > +static void test_uffd_minor(int fd, size_t total_size)
> > +{
> > + struct uffdio_api uffdio_api = {
> > + .api = UFFD_API,
> > + .features = UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_GENERIC,
>
> Should it be UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM instead? UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_GENERIC
> was removed in the v1.
I'll drop .features completely, the checks in UFFDIO_REGISTER are
sufficient.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists