linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v19 00/15] net: phy: Introduce PHY ports representation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c88eec2-0985-4e05-8f0b-8ce525ddca94@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:46:14 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
 Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
 Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
 Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org,
 Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
 Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
 Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>,
 Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v19 00/15] net: phy: Introduce PHY ports
 representation

On 11/27/25 11:10 AM, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> On 27/11/2025 04:00, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 13:42:59 +0100 Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>>> This is v19 of the phy_port work. Patches 2 and 3 lack PHY maintainers reviews.
>>>
>>> This v19 has no changes compared to v18, but patch 2 was rebased on top
>>> of the recent 1.6T linkmodes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for everyone's patience and reviews on that work ! Now, the
>>> usual blurb for the series description.
>>
>> Hopefully we can still make v6.19, but we hooked up Claude Code review
>> to patchwork this week, and it points out some legit issues here :(
>> Some look transient but others are definitely legit, please look thru
>> this:
>>
>> https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=5388d317-98c9-458e-8655-d60f31112574
> 
> Is there a canonical way to reply to these reviews ? Some are good, some
> aren't.

AFAIK there isn't yet a formalized process for that.

> I'll summarize what I've done in the changelog, but it skips any
> potential discussions that could've been triggered by these reviews. I
> guess this is a matter of letting this process stabilize :)

If you have time it would be great if you could send an email to Chris
Mason (clm@...a.com) detailing the bad parts and why are incorrect.

Thanks,

Paolo