[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5392c29-1097-4b7d-a8c1-3536c8f46bea@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 19:19:34 +0530
From: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <mukesh.savaliya@....qualcomm.com>,
Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, psodagud@...cinc.com, djaggi@...cinc.com,
quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com,
quic_arandive@...cinc.com, quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] soc: qcom: geni-se: Refactor geni_icc_get() and
make qup-memory ICC path optional
Hi Bjorn,
Thank you for review
On 11/26/2025 8:37 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 10:30:07AM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
>> Refactor the geni_icc_get() function to replace the loop-based ICC path
>> initialization with explicit handling of each interconnect path. This
>> improves code readability and allows for different error handling per
>> path type.
>
> I don't think this "improves code readability", IMO you're turning a
> clean loop into a unrolled mess.
>
>
> But then comes the least significant portion of your "problem
> description" (i.e. the last words of it), where you indicate that this
> would allow you to have different error handling for "qup-memory".
>
> This is actually a valid reason to make this change, so say that!
>
>
>>
>> The "qup-core" and "qup-config" paths remain mandatory, while "qup-memory"
>> is now optional and skipped if not defined in DT.
>>
>
> Please rewrite this message to _start_ with the problem description.
> Make it clear on the first line/sentence why the change should be done.
>
> E.g. compare with something like this:
>
> """
> "qup-memory" is an optional interconnect path, unroll the geni_icc_get()
> loop in order to allow specific error handling for this path.
> """
>
> You only need to read 4 words to understand exactly why this patch
> exists.
The "qup-memory" interconnect path is optional and may not be defined
in all device trees. Unroll the loop-based ICC path initialization to
allow specific error handling for each path type.
The "qup-core" and "qup-config" paths remain mandatory and will fail
probe if missing, while "qup-memory" is now handled as optional and
skipped when not present in the device tree.
I hope the commit text above should be appropriate
Thanks,
Praveen
>
>> Co-developed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c
>> index cd1779b6a91a..b6167b968ef6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom-geni-se.c
>> @@ -899,30 +899,32 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(geni_se_rx_dma_unprep);
>>
>> int geni_icc_get(struct geni_se *se, const char *icc_ddr)
>> {
>> - int i, err;
>> - const char *icc_names[] = {"qup-core", "qup-config", icc_ddr};
>> + struct geni_icc_path *icc_paths = se->icc_paths;
>>
>> if (has_acpi_companion(se->dev))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(se->icc_paths); i++) {
>> - if (!icc_names[i])
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - se->icc_paths[i].path = devm_of_icc_get(se->dev, icc_names[i]);
>> - if (IS_ERR(se->icc_paths[i].path))
>> - goto err;
>> + icc_paths[GENI_TO_CORE].path = devm_of_icc_get(se->dev, "qup-core");
>> + if (IS_ERR(icc_paths[GENI_TO_CORE].path))
>> + return dev_err_probe(se->dev, PTR_ERR(icc_paths[GENI_TO_CORE].path),
>> + "Failed to get 'qup-core' ICC path\n");
>
> To taste, but I think a local variable would be helpful to make this
> less dense.
Sure, will do it in next version.
Thanks,
Praveen
>
> path = devm_of_icc_get(se->dev, "qup-core");
> if (IS_ERR(path))
> return dev_err_probe(se->dev, PTR_ERR(path), "Failed to get 'qup-core' ICC path\n");
> icc_paths[GENI_TO_CORE].path = path;
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> +
>> + icc_paths[CPU_TO_GENI].path = devm_of_icc_get(se->dev, "qup-config");
>> + if (IS_ERR(icc_paths[CPU_TO_GENI].path))
>> + return dev_err_probe(se->dev, PTR_ERR(icc_paths[CPU_TO_GENI].path),
>> + "Failed to get 'qup-config' ICC path\n");
>> +
>> + /* The DDR path is optional, depending on protocol and hw capabilities */
>> + icc_paths[GENI_TO_DDR].path = devm_of_icc_get(se->dev, "qup-memory");
>> + if (IS_ERR(icc_paths[GENI_TO_DDR].path)) {
>> + if (PTR_ERR(icc_paths[GENI_TO_DDR].path) == -ENODATA)
>> + icc_paths[GENI_TO_DDR].path = NULL;
>> + else
>> + return dev_err_probe(se->dev, PTR_ERR(icc_paths[GENI_TO_DDR].path),
>> + "Failed to get 'qup-memory' ICC path\n");
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> -
>> -err:
>> - err = PTR_ERR(se->icc_paths[i].path);
>> - if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> - dev_err_ratelimited(se->dev, "Failed to get ICC path '%s': %d\n",
>> - icc_names[i], err);
>> - return err;
>> -
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(geni_icc_get);
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists