[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251127144125.233728-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:41:23 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] platform/surface: acpi-notify: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
The refactoring is going to alter the default behavior of
alloc_workqueue() to be unbound by default.
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU. For more details see the Link tag below.
In order to keep alloc_workqueue() behavior identical, explicitly request
WQ_PERCPU.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
---
drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
index 3b30cfe3466b..a9dcb0bbe90e 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/surface/surface_acpi_notify.c
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ static int __init san_init(void)
{
int ret;
- san_wq = alloc_workqueue("san_wq", 0, 0);
+ san_wq = alloc_workqueue("san_wq", WQ_PERCPU, 0);
if (!san_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = platform_driver_register(&surface_acpi_notify);
--
2.51.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists