[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSoiTfFgYV2PZfKE@gpd4>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 23:29:33 +0100
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
void@...ifault.com, changwoo@...lia.com, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched: Rework sched_class::wakeup_preempt() and
rq_modified_*()
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 04:39:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
...
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1119,7 +1119,6 @@ struct rq {
> raw_spinlock_t __lock;
>
> /* Per class runqueue modification mask; bits in class order. */
We should probably remove this comment as well along with queue_mask.
Thanks,
-Andrea
> - unsigned int queue_mask;
> unsigned int nr_running;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> unsigned int nr_numa_running;
> @@ -1179,6 +1178,7 @@ struct rq {
> struct sched_dl_entity *dl_server;
> struct task_struct *idle;
> struct task_struct *stop;
> + const struct sched_class *next_class;
> unsigned long next_balance;
> struct mm_struct *prev_mm;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists