[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87qztireza.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 12:52:09 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Lalit Shankar Chowdhury <lalitshankarch@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/fat: Remove unnecessary wrapper fat_max_cache()
Lalit Shankar Chowdhury <lalitshankarch@...il.com> writes:
> fat_max_cache() always returned FAT_MAX_CACHE and did not use the inode
> parameter. So, use the FAT_MAX_CACHE constant directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lalit Shankar Chowdhury <lalitshankarch@...il.com>
Looks good.
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
> ---
> fs/fat/cache.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/cache.c b/fs/fat/cache.c
> index 2af424e200b3..630f3056658e 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/cache.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/cache.c
> @@ -29,11 +29,6 @@ struct fat_cache_id {
> int dcluster;
> };
>
> -static inline int fat_max_cache(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> - return FAT_MAX_CACHE;
> -}
> -
> static struct kmem_cache *fat_cache_cachep;
>
> static void init_once(void *foo)
> @@ -145,7 +140,7 @@ static void fat_cache_add(struct inode *inode, struct fat_cache_id *new)
>
> cache = fat_cache_merge(inode, new);
> if (cache == NULL) {
> - if (MSDOS_I(inode)->nr_caches < fat_max_cache(inode)) {
> + if (MSDOS_I(inode)->nr_caches < FAT_MAX_CACHE) {
> MSDOS_I(inode)->nr_caches++;
> spin_unlock(&MSDOS_I(inode)->cache_lru_lock);
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists