[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251128160815.64709af7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 16:08:15 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Nathan Chancellor
<nathan@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej
Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Initialize mutex::magic even when
LOCKDEP=n
Hi all,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 06:54:21 -0800 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> When DEBUG_MUTEXES=y and LOCKDEP=n, mutex_lock() still checks on
> ->magic, hence debug_mutex_init() should be called in
> mutex_init_generic() as well. While we are at it, decouple LOCKDEP
> logic from debug_mutex_init(), because in this way debug_mutex_init()
> only needs one parameter, and we now have mutex_init_lockep() for
> LOCKDEP=y scenarios.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251117202214.4f710f02@canb.auug.org.au/
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251121215819.GA1374726@ax162/
> Fixes: 3572e2edc7b6 ("locking/mutex: Redo __mutex_init()")
> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
> Peter,
>
> Feel free to fold it into commit 3572e2edc7b6 ("locking/mutex: Redo
> __mutex_init()"), just resend it properly so it won't fall off your
> radar ;-)
>
> kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 10 +---------
> kernel/locking/mutex.c | 8 +++++++-
> kernel/locking/mutex.h | 5 ++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Any chance if this being applied? I am still seeing the boot warning.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists