linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/bridge: handle gracefully atomic updates during bridge removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DEK6B0KMDCCN.3U4FLO44L04FC@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:09:17 +0100
From: "Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, "David Airlie"
 <airlied@...il.com>, "Dmitry Baryshkov" <lumag@...nel.org>, "Hui Pu"
 <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>, "Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 "Jonas Karlman" <jonas@...boo.se>, "Laurent Pinchart"
 <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, "Maarten Lankhorst"
 <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, "Neil Armstrong"
 <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, "Robert Foss" <rfoss@...nel.org>, "Simona
 Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 "Francesco Dolcini" <francesco@...cini.it>, "Emanuele Ghidoli"
 <ghidoliemanuele@...il.com>, João Paulo Gonçalves
 <jpaulo.silvagoncalves@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/bridge: handle gracefully atomic updates
 during bridge removal

Hi Maxime,

+Cc Emanuele, Francesco, João

On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 7:35 PM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:34:33 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> This is a first attempt at gracefully handling the case of atomic updates
>> happening concurrently to physical removal of DRM bridges.
>>
>> This is part of the work to support hotplug of DRM bridges. The grand plan
>> was discussed in [1].
>>
>> [ ... ]
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>

Thanks for reviewing!

Two alternative patches [0][1] have been sent to address the issue with
PLL_UNLOCK, and both would conflict with patch 2 of this series. So I'd
keep this series on hold for a while, waiting for a decision to be taken
about how the PLL_UNLOCK issue will be handled. I'll then rebase this
series as needed.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251127-drm-ti-sn65dsi83-ignore-pll-unlock-v1-1-8a03fdf562e9@bootlin.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251125103900.31750-1-francesco@dolcini.it/

Luca

--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com