[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251128083219.2332407-4-zhangshida@kylinos.cn>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 16:32:10 +0800
From: zhangshida <starzhangzsd@...il.com>
To: Johannes.Thumshirn@....com,
hch@...radead.org,
gruenba@...hat.com,
ming.lei@...hat.com,
siangkao@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhangshida@...inos.cn,
starzhangzsd@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/12] md: bcache: fix improper use of bi_end_io
From: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@...inos.cn>
Don't call bio->bi_end_io() directly. Use the bio_endio() helper
function instead, which handles completion more safely and uniformly.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Shida Zhang <zhangshida@...inos.cn>
---
drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index af345dc6fde..82fdea7dea7 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void detached_dev_end_io(struct bio *bio)
}
kfree(ddip);
- bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+ bio_endio(bio);
}
static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
if (!ddip) {
bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
- bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+ bio_endio(bio);
return;
}
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
if ((bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) &&
!bdev_max_discard_sectors(dc->bdev))
- bio->bi_end_io(bio);
+ detached_dev_end_io(bio);
else
submit_bio_noacct(bio);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists