linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Update the clock suffix for Glymur

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <215aef75-682d-4cdb-a6b6-c2de805c4a69@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:04:52 +0530
From: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Bjorn Andersson
 <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Ajit Pandey
 <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
        Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Update the clock suffix for Glymur



On 11/28/2025 12:59 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Taniya,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on 92fd6e84175befa1775e5c0ab682938eca27c0b2]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Taniya-Das/clk-qcom-clk-rpmh-Update-the-clock-suffix-for-Glymur/20251126-021404
> base:   92fd6e84175befa1775e5c0ab682938eca27c0b2
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251125-glymur_rpmhcc_fix-v1-1-60081b3cce7f%40oss.qualcomm.com
> patch subject: [PATCH] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Update the clock suffix for Glymur
> config: arm64-randconfig-003-20251127 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251128/202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251128/202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511280306.L2l4tAmD-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:891:21: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a2'?
>      891 |  [RPMH_RF_CLK3]  = &clk_rpmh_clk3_a.hw,
>          |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                     clk_rpmh_clk3_a2
>>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:892:22: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a_ao' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk3_a2_ao'?
>      892 |  [RPMH_RF_CLK3_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk3_a_ao.hw,
>          |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                      clk_rpmh_clk3_a2_ao
>>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:893:21: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a2'?
>      893 |  [RPMH_RF_CLK4]  = &clk_rpmh_clk4_a.hw,
>          |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                     clk_rpmh_clk4_a2
>>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:894:22: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a_ao' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk4_a2_ao'?
>      894 |  [RPMH_RF_CLK4_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk4_a_ao.hw,
>          |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                      clk_rpmh_clk4_a2_ao
>>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:895:21: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a2'?
>      895 |  [RPMH_RF_CLK5]  = &clk_rpmh_clk5_a.hw,
>          |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                     clk_rpmh_clk5_a2
>>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:896:22: error: 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a_ao' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'clk_rpmh_clk5_a2_ao'?
>      896 |  [RPMH_RF_CLK5_A] = &clk_rpmh_clk5_a_ao.hw,
>          |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                      clk_rpmh_clk5_a2_ao
> 
> 
> vim +891 drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> 
> c035a9e265dd80 Taniya Das 2024-12-04  887  
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25  888  static struct clk_hw *glymur_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25  889  	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25  890  	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2_ao.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @891  	[RPMH_RF_CLK3]		= &clk_rpmh_clk3_a.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @892  	[RPMH_RF_CLK3_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk3_a_ao.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @893  	[RPMH_RF_CLK4]		= &clk_rpmh_clk4_a.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @894  	[RPMH_RF_CLK4_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk4_a_ao.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @895  	[RPMH_RF_CLK5]		= &clk_rpmh_clk5_a.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25 @896  	[RPMH_RF_CLK5_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk5_a_ao.hw,
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25  897  };
> ebcb9db98bdab8 Taniya Das 2025-08-25  898  
> 




It is fixed in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251126-gcc_kaanapali-v3-v4-1-0fe73d6898e9@oss.qualcomm.com/
and it is pulled in the series:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251126-gcc_kaanapali-v3-v4-1-0fe73d6898e9@oss.qualcomm.com/

-- 
Thanks,
Taniya Das