lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60fe241d-276f-489e-9c74-677dd154b454@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 12:51:14 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@....qualcomm.com>, srini@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_bkumar@...cinc.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_chennak@...cinc.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, arnd@...db.de,
        dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] misc: fastrpc: Expand context ID mask for DSP
 polling mode support

On 11/28/25 6:05 AM, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> Current FastRPC message context uses a 12-bit mask where the upper
> 8 bits represent the context ID from idr_alloc_cyclic and the lower
> 4 bits represent the PD type.

<newline>

> This layout works for normal FastRPC
> calls but fails for polling mode because DSP expects a 16-bit context
> with an additional async mode bit. 

<newline>

> To enable polling mode support
> from DSP(DSP writes to poll memory), DSP expects a 16-bit context
> where the upper 8 bits are context ID, the lower 4 bits are PD type
> and the 5th bit from the end denotes async mode(not yet upstreamed).

<newline>

so we get

1
5	       0
CCCCCCCCxxxAPPPP

where C is context ID, A is is_async, and P is PD type

are the x bits reserved, or do they serve some purpose?

> If this bit is set, DSP disables polling. With the current design,
> odd context IDs set this bit, causing DSP to skip poll memory updates.

<newline>

> Update the context mask to ensure a hole which won't get populated,

"to avoid erroneously setting that bit"

> ensuring polling mode works as expected. This is not a bug and the
> change is added to support polling mode.

I think the main question that remains unanswered here is that you alter
the non-polling mode mask to become compliant with what polling-mode
expects.

Is that intended? Will this still work fine without patch 4 and the
new FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION?

Konrad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ