[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa78f0418ca2f408cdc31b478963ddeab797faa7.camel@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:59:25 -0300
From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel@...cstar.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, John Ogness
<john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby
<jirislaby@...nel.org>, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, Daniel
Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Anton Ivanov
<anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] printk cleanup - part 2
On Fri, 2025-11-28 at 09:52 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 04:18:40PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2025-11-21 15:50:32, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > > The first part can be found here[1]. The proposed changes do not
> > > change the functionality of printk, but were suggestions made by
> > > Petr Mladek. I already have more patches for a part 3 ,but I
> > > would like
> > > to see these ones merged first.
> > >
> > > I did the testing with VMs, checking suspend and resume cycles,
> > > and it worked
> > > as expected.
> > >
> > > Thanks for reviewing!
> >
> > > Marcos Paulo de Souza (4):
> > > drivers: serial: kgdboc: Drop checks for CON_ENABLED and
> > > CON_BOOT
> > > arch: um: kmsg_dump: Use console_is_usable
> > > printk: Use console_is_usable on console_unblank
> >
> > These three patches were simple, straightforward, and ready for
> > linux
> > next.
> >
> > I have comitted them into printk/linux.git, branch rework/nbcon-in-
> > kdb.
> > I am going to push them for 6.19.
>
> I pointed the kgdb test suite at this branch (as I did for the
> earlier
> part of the patchset, although I think I forgot to post about it).
>
> The console coverage is fairly modest (I think just 8250 and PL011
> drivers, with and without earlycon) and the suite exercises features
> rather than crash resilience. Nevertheless and FWIW, the tests didn't
> pick up any regressions. Yay!
Thanks Daniel! I remember that you said that you would run the
testsuite in the previous patchset, but didn't want to bother asking
you (I believe that if you found anything you would point it out either
way :) ).
>
>
> Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists