linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched: Rework sched_class::wakeup_preempt() and rq_modified

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DEKD1W6CI6UJ.3TWR30PXQCF8O@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 13:26:30 +0000
From: Kuba Piecuch <jpiecuch@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, 
	<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>, 
	<mgorman@...e.de>, <vschneid@...hat.com>, <tj@...nel.org>, 
	<void@...ifault.com>, <arighi@...dia.com>, <changwoo@...lia.com>, 
	<sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched: Rework sched_class::wakeup_preempt() and rq_modified_*()

Hi Peter,

On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 3:39 PM UTC, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Additionally have set_next_task() re-set the value to the current class.

I don't see this part reflected in the patch. Is something missing?

Best,
Kuba