[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251129144202.0567743b@robin>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 14:42:02 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers
<irogers@...gle.com>, James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Thomas
Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Skip internal syscall arguments
On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 11:07:20 -0800
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Even with this patch applied, I still have a segfault with this command:
> >
> > # ./perf trace -e syscalls:sys_enter_write
>
> What about this?
>
> # ./perf trace -e write
Yes that works. As long as it isn't considered a regression that the
sys_enter_write crashes, then I'm fine with;
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists