[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ce1757e3267df037912b303f60c662c45d0a6e6.camel@amazon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:45:01 +0000
From: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
To: "Sieber, Fernand" <sieberf@...zon.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "Saenz Julienne, Nicolas" <nsaenz@...zon.es>, "Busse, Anselm"
<abusse@...zon.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "bp@...en8.de"
<bp@...en8.de>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Schönherr, Jan H. <jschoenh@...zon.de>, "Borghorst,
Hendrik" <hborghor@...zon.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "nh-open-source@...zon.com"
<nh-open-source@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not accidentally create BTS events
On Mon, 2025-12-01 at 16:23 +0200, Fernand Sieber wrote
> Perf considers the combination of PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS with
> a sample_period of 1 a special case and handles this as a BTS event (see
> intel_pmu_has_bts_period()) -- a deviation from the usual semantic,
> where the sample_period represents the amount of branch instructions to
> encounter before the overflow handler is invoked.
That's kind of awful, and seems to be the real underlying cause of the KVM
issue. Can we kill it with fire? Peter?
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5964 bytes)
Amazon Development Centre (London) Ltd. Registered in England and Wales with registration number 04543232 with its registered office at 1 Principal Place, Worship Street, London EC2A 2FA, United Kingdom.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists