lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251201-fragrant-kingfisher-of-expertise-e43bff@houat>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:34:20 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, 
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, 
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>, Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>, 
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, 
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, 
	Adrien Grassein <adrien.grassein@...il.com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>, 
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>, Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, 
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisanthus@...el.com>, 
	Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@...el.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, 
	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, 
	Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/26] drm/bridge: make of_drm_find_bridge() a wrapper of
 drm_of_find_bridge()

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> On Mon Nov 24, 2025 at 11:22 AM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 02:05:35PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> >> of_drm_find_bridge() is identical to drm_of_find_bridge() except it does
> >> not increment the refcount. Rewrite it as a wrapper and put the bridge
> >> being returned so the behaviour is still the same.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> >
> > Kind of the same comment than on the TODO. Is it worth doing that patch
> > when we could just remove it at the end of the series?
> 
> This series is not converting all users I'm afraid.
> 
> There are still some drivers to convert, but not a big deal.

Oh, ok, my bad then :)

> The main user to be converted is drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(), which is
> very tricky, and in turn it is used by devm_drm_of_get_bridge(). We
> discussed this in the past and the conclusion was a rework of the drm_panel
> lifetime was needed to be able to properly replace
> drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge().

Yeah. I wonder, now that we have a proper allocation scheme for panels
too, if we shouldn't just create a panel_bridge for every panel we
allocate.

> A drm_panel rework had started very well with devm_drm_panel_alloc() that
> got upstreamed by Anusha, but I'm not sure if it has made further progress
> after that. So AFAICT the plan is still "People will gradually switch to
> the new API over time", and the deprecated of_drm_find_bridge() will be
> removed after that.
> 
> Does it still make sense to you?

Yep.

> Maxime, Anusha, are you aware of any steps forward about dynamic panel
> lifetime, after devm_drm_panel_alloc()?

AFAIK, Anusha stopped working on it. I'm fairly busy at the moment, but
early next year I'll try to revive that effort.

> >> @@ -1460,19 +1460,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_bridge);
> >>   */
> >>  struct drm_bridge *of_drm_find_bridge(struct device_node *np)
> >>  {
> >> -	struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> >> -
> >> -	mutex_lock(&bridge_lock);
> >> +	struct drm_bridge *bridge = drm_of_find_bridge(np);
> >>
> >> -	list_for_each_entry(bridge, &bridge_list, list) {
> >> -		if (bridge->of_node == np) {
> >> -			mutex_unlock(&bridge_lock);
> >> -			return bridge;
> >> -		}
> >> -	}
> >> +	drm_bridge_put(bridge);
> >
> > And if it does make sense to keep that patch, we should add a comment
> > here to document why we are doing this.
> 
> OK, what about:
> 
> /**
>  * We need to emulate the original semantice of of_drm_find_bridge(), which
>  * was not getting any bridge reference. Being now based on
>  * drm_of_find_bridge() which gets a reference, put it before returning.
>  */

Yep, sounds good

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ