[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3t6quaz6j5mbzewgrszuzmjmv74bzqrskx5k4ewgsfbaijmoli@y7goctaq35mj>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:12:39 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, lihuisong@...wei.com, yubowen8@...wei.com,
zhangpengjie2@...wei.com, wangzhi12@...wei.com, linhongye@...artners.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_boost_trigger_state()
optimization
On 28-11-25, 17:13, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
> Simplify the error handling branch code in cpufreq_boost_trigger_state().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index a4399e5490da..a725747572c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2824,18 +2824,13 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
>
> ret = policy_set_boost(policy, state);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_reset_state;
> + break;
> }
>
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_reset_state;
> -
> cpus_read_unlock();
>
> - return 0;
> -
> -err_reset_state:
> - cpus_read_unlock();
> + if (!ret)
Maybe we can make this `if (likely(!ret))`
> + return 0;
>
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists