linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kernel-parameters: Move the kernel build options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2ff1286390fd48b1f62638980a2082e785de913@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 19:35:46 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kernel-parameters: Move the kernel build
 options

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 08:42:43AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> But we could certainly just put the whole contents of kernel-parameters.txt
>> as a literal block within kernel-parameters.rst and at least have it all in
>> one place.
>
> That would've been my next idea...

That's how it was originally, but that lead to some problems with the
PDF builds. I wish I could tell you what the issues were specifically,
instead I just have to blame my past self for not recording the details
in the commit message properly: e52347bd66f6
("Documentation/admin-guide: split the kernel parameter list to a
separate file").

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel