linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] fs/hfs: fix s_fs_info leak on setup_bdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9061911554697106be2703189f02e5765f3df229.camel@ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:24:00 +0000
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
To: "brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
        "mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@...il.com" <mehdi.benhadjkhelifa@...il.com>
CC: "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>, "khalid@...nel.org" <khalid@...nel.org>,
        "frank.li@...o.com" <frank.li@...o.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "slava@...eyko.com" <slava@...eyko.com>,
        "david.hunter.linux@...il.com" <david.hunter.linux@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
	<linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        "skhan@...uxfoundation.org"
	<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de"
	<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk"
	<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "syzbot+ad45f827c88778ff7df6@...kaller.appspotmail.com"
	<syzbot+ad45f827c88778ff7df6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] fs/hfs: fix s_fs_info leak on setup_bdev_super()
 failure

On Sat, 2025-11-29 at 13:48 +0100, Mehdi Ben Hadj Khelifa wrote:
> On 11/27/25 9:19 PM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> > 

<skipped>

> > 
> > As far as I can see, the situation is improving with the patches. I can say that
> > patches have been tested and I am ready to pick up the patches into HFS/HFS+
> > tree.
> > 
> > Mehdi, should I expect the formal patches from you? Or should I take the patches
> > as it is?
> > 
> 
> I can send them from my part. Should I add signed-off-by tag at the end 
> appended to them?
> 

If you are OK with the current commit message, then I can simply add your
signed-off-by tag on my side. If you would like to polish the commit message
somehow, then I can wait the patches from you. So, what is your decision?

> 
> Also, I want to give an apologies for the delayed/none reply about the 
> crash of xfstests on my part. I went back testing them 3 days earlier 
> and they started showing different results again and then I have broken 
> my finger....Which caused me to have much slower progress.I'm still 
> working on getting the same crashes as I did before where I get them 
> when running any test.Because I ran quick tests and they didn't crash. 
> only with auto around the 631 test for desktop and around 642 on my 
> laptop for both not patched and patched kernels.I'm going to update you 
> on that matter when I can have predictable behavior and cause of the 
> crash/call stack.But expect slow progress from my part here for the 
> reason I mentionned before.
> 

No problem. Take your time.

Thanks,
Slava.

>