lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aS3seTNRum3ZXMom@yury>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:28:57 -0500
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Burak Emir <bqe@...gle.com>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: id_pool: fix example

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 01:09:49AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> When building with KUnit doctests enabled, `rustc` reports:
> 
>     error[E0599]: no method named `acquire_next_id` found for struct `IdPool` in the current scope
>         --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:6722:24
>          |
>     6722 |     assert_eq!(i, pool.acquire_next_id(i).ok_or(ENOSPC)?);
>          |                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ method not found in `IdPool`
> 
> Thus fix it.
> 
> Fixes: a5726454470c ("rust: id_pool: do not immediately acquire new ids")
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>

Thanks Miguel,

I applied this, but the fact that you've sent a second fix to
documentation that actually is a build fix, raises the questions.

Because Rust documentation bears compilable chunks of code, I think
we need to enable rustdoc tests target by default, so that developers
will not send broken tests.

Thanks,
Yury

> ---
> I saw this in -next.
> 
>  rust/kernel/id_pool.rs | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs b/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
> index 73a952d7dd83..384753fe0e44 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/id_pool.rs
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  ///
>  /// let mut pool = IdPool::with_capacity(64, GFP_KERNEL)?;
>  /// for i in 0..64 {
> -///     assert_eq!(i, pool.acquire_next_id(i).ok_or(ENOSPC)?);
> +///     assert_eq!(i, pool.find_unused_id(i).ok_or(ENOSPC)?.acquire());
>  /// }
>  ///
>  /// pool.release_id(23);
> 
> base-commit: 00c5ce039598e692e1dd4bf2b3ad5bc08bdf3270
> --
> 2.52.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ