[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fccc4878-a205-45cf-b651-53c151e48d25@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:31:47 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] rust: build_assert: add instructions for use with
function arguments
On 12/1/25 8:43 AM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 5:36 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
...
>> Is there proc macro magic we can come up with? Or rustc or clippy
>> changes? So that this is becomes a better foundation upon which to
>> build?
>
> Converting more code to macros has their own set of tradeoffs, but it
> depends on what you mean. Do you have something in mind?
Mainly just: is there a way to automatically "derive" (generate) an
always-inline directive for any function that attempts to call
build_assert!() on any of its arguments? And in fact, *force* the
always-inline, if it is not forced hard enough today.
Something along those lines.
>
> And yes, I have had it in our usual lists for a long time and we
> mentioned it to upstream Rust and so on. We are well aware that
> `build_assert!` isn't ideal, and in many cases it is best to avoid it
> when there is a better approach.
>
> Now, if a company has the means to improve the situation, e.g. by
> sponsoring someone upstream to work on features like this, then by all
> means, please go ahead! That would be very welcome, and we have some
> contacts that could be interested in working on things like that, so
> please feel free to ping.
>
I will bring this up (along with the KSYM_NAME_LEN hashed symbol project)
to our internal Rust groups. Both of these seem like nice, self-contained
projects that someone could really get into.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists