| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <381c2557-a714-41f6-8dd2-e0df1ca65919@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:24:44 -0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/4] mm/readahead: fix the broken readahead for
POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED
On 2025/12/2 05:01, Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> This patch fixes the broken readahead flow for POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED, where
> the problem is, in force_page_cache_ra(nr_to_read), nr_to_read is cut by
> the below code.
>
> max_pages = max_t(unsigned long, bdi->io_pages, ra->ra_pages);
> nr_to_read = min_t(unsigned long, nr_to_read, max_pages);
>
> IOWs, we are not able to read ahead larger than the above max_pages which
> is most likely the range of 2MB and 16MB. Note, it doesn't make sense
> to set ra->ra_pages to the entire file size. Instead, let's fix this logic.
>
> Before:
> f2fs_fadvise: dev = (252,16), ino = 14, i_size = 4294967296 offset:0, len:4294967296, advise:3
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=0 nr_to_read=512 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=512 nr_to_read=512 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=1024 nr_to_read=512 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=1536 nr_to_read=512 lookahead_size=0
>
> After:
> f2fs_fadvise: dev = (252,16), ino = 14, i_size = 4294967296 offset:0, len:4294967296, advise:3
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=0 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=2048 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=4096 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=6144 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=8192 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=10240 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=12288 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=14336 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=16384 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=18432 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=20480 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=22528 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=24576 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> ...
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=1042432 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=1044480 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
> page_cache_ra_unbounded: dev=252:16 ino=e index=1046528 nr_to_read=2048 lookahead_size=0
>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/readahead.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> index 3a4b5d58eeb6..c0db049a5b7b 100644
> --- a/mm/readahead.c
> +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_cache_ra_unbounded);
> * behaviour which would occur if page allocations are causing VM writeback.
> * We really don't want to intermingle reads and writes like that.
> */
> -static void do_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
> +static int do_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
> unsigned long nr_to_read, unsigned long lookahead_size)
> {
> struct inode *inode = ractl->mapping->host;
> @@ -320,45 +320,42 @@ static void do_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
> pgoff_t end_index; /* The last page we want to read */
>
> if (isize == 0)
> - return;
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> end_index = (isize - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> if (index > end_index)
> - return;
> + return -EINVAL;
> /* Don't read past the page containing the last byte of the file */
> if (nr_to_read > end_index - index)
> nr_to_read = end_index - index + 1;
>
> page_cache_ra_unbounded(ractl, nr_to_read, lookahead_size);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> - * Chunk the readahead into 2 megabyte units, so that we don't pin too much
> - * memory at once.
> + * Chunk the readahead per the block device capacity, and read all nr_to_read.
> */
> void force_page_cache_ra(struct readahead_control *ractl,
> unsigned long nr_to_read)
> {
> struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
> - struct file_ra_state *ra = ractl->ra;
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
> - unsigned long max_pages;
> + unsigned long this_chunk;
>
> if (unlikely(!mapping->a_ops->read_folio && !mapping->a_ops->readahead))
> return;
>
> /*
> - * If the request exceeds the readahead window, allow the read to
> - * be up to the optimal hardware IO size
> + * Consier the optimal hardware IO size for readahead chunk.
s/Consier/Consider
Thanks,
> */
> - max_pages = max_t(unsigned long, bdi->io_pages, ra->ra_pages);
> - nr_to_read = min_t(unsigned long, nr_to_read, max_pages);
> + this_chunk = max_t(unsigned long, bdi->io_pages, ractl->ra->ra_pages);
> +
> while (nr_to_read) {
> - unsigned long this_chunk = (2 * 1024 * 1024) / PAGE_SIZE;
> + this_chunk = min_t(unsigned long, this_chunk, nr_to_read);
>
> - if (this_chunk > nr_to_read)
> - this_chunk = nr_to_read;
> - do_page_cache_ra(ractl, this_chunk, 0);
> + if (do_page_cache_ra(ractl, this_chunk, 0))
> + break;
>
> nr_to_read -= this_chunk;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists