linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: insist on the plain-text requirement for security reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025120112-sublet-parasitic-18da@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 07:38:17 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Security Officers <security@...nel.org>, kees@...nel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: insist on the plain-text requirement for
 security reports

On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 03:17:41PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> As the trend of AI-generated reports is growing, the trend of unreadable
> reports in gimmicky formats is following, and we cannot request that
> developers rely on online viewers to be able to read a security report
> full for formatting tags. Let's just insist on the plain text requirement
> a bit more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Looks good to me!  Given the number of non-plain-text emails with binary
attachments we still get there, it's obvious not many people seem to
read this file, but it can't hurt!  :)

I'll queue this up if Jon doesn't, after -rc1 is out.  If he wants to
take it, here's my:

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>