[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e9e01cb-6140-441f-968a-a520fe4e7e6a@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:21:43 +0800
From: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: switch on-disk header `erofs_fs.h` to MIT license
On 2025/12/1 10:38, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Switch to the permissive MIT license to make the EROFS on-disk format
> more interoperable across various use cases.
>
> It was previously recommended by the Composefs folks, for example:
> https://github.com/composefs/composefs/pull/216#discussion_r1356409501
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
Thanks,
Hongbo
> ---
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> index 3d5738f80072..e24268acdd62 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR Apache-2.0 */
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> /*
> * EROFS (Enhanced ROM File System) on-disk format definition
> *
Powered by blists - more mailing lists