[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4z6kSvA+Yzqx=JQ4n3jhQRWn4zYMr364-V2Wjyb2wXE0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:59:19 +0800
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Richard Chang <richardycc@...gle.com>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: introduce compressed data writeback
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 11:56 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
<senozhatsky@...omium.org> wrote:
[...]
> > > zram stores all written back slots raw, which implies that
> > > during writeback zram first has to decompress slots (except
> > > for ZRAM_HUGE slots, which are raw already). The problem
> > > with this approach is that not every written back page gets
> > > read back (either via read() or via page-fault), which means
> > > that zram basically wastes CPU cycles and battery decompressing
> > > such slots. This changes with introduction of decompression
> >
> > If a page is swapped out and never read again, does that actually indicate
> > a memory leak in userspace?
>
> No, it just means that there is no page-fault on that page. E.g. we
> swapped out an unused browser tab and never come back to it within the
> session: e.g. user closed the tab/app, or logged out of session, or
> rebooted the device, or simply powered off (desktop/laptop).
Thanks, Sergey. That makes sense to me. On Android, users don’t have a
close button, yet apps can still be OOM-killed; those pages are never
swapped in.
Thanks
Barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists