[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01da01dc6263$39efe660$adcfb320$@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 10:38:35 +0900
From: 손신 <shin.son@...sung.com>
To: "'Tudor Ambarus'" <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, "'Bartlomiej
Zolnierkiewicz'" <bzolnier@...il.com>, "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'"
<krzk@...nel.org>, "'Rafael J . Wysocki'" <rafael@...nel.org>, "'Daniel
Lezcano'" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, "'Zhang Rui'" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"'Lukasz Luba'" <lukasz.luba@....com>, "'Rob Herring'" <robh@...nel.org>,
"'Conor Dooley'" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "'Alim Akhtar'"
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>
Cc: "'Henrik Grimler'" <henrik@...mler.se>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Peter Griffin'" <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
'André Draszik' <andre.draszik@...aro.org>, "'William
McVicker'" <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, <jyescas@...gle.com>,
<shin.son@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 RESEND 2/3] thermal: exynos_tmu: Support new hardware
and update TMU interface
Hello, Tudor Ambarus.
> > Yes, Do you have any plans to upstream the GS101 TMU code? From what I
> > understand,
>
> Yes, I'm currently working on upstreaming the GS101 TMU code. My plan is
> to do the acpm tmu helpers and then integrate the gs101 TMU support with
> what will be the new exynos TMU driver.
Ok, Understood.
> > Autov9 and exynos850 are unlikely to be upstreamed in their current form.
>
> From what I understand from your email exchanges with Daniel, you're going
> to propose a new driver. Is my understanding correct? Do you have a
> timeline for it?
> I'll then follow with the gs101 support.
We don't have a timeline yet. Separating the driver was not our initial plan,
So this work will likely be postponed to next year. When we resume it, I will CC you.
> exynos850 has the same reg layout as eav920 and gs101 too. If Exynos9-era
> is a common terminology used inside Samsung then we should be good to go
> with
> Exynos9 prefix I think. Especially since we have a predecessor, the
> renaming tried in pinctrl. But if you're not sure about it, use just
> EXYNOS_ then.
>
> Cheers,
> ta
Got it. Thank you for your clarification.
Best regards,
Shin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists