[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acae92d8-3394-436c-be8e-8bed7a923e85@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:06:55 +0530
From: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
joro@...tes.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nicolinc@...dia.com
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] arm64: dts: nvidia: Add nodes for CMDQV
On 11/25/2025 3:52 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>
> On 25/11/2025 07:16, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>> The Command Queue Virtualization (CMDQV) hardware is part of the
>> SMMUv3 implementation on NVIDIA Tegra SoCs. It assists in
>> virtualizing the command queue for the SMMU.
>>
>> Update SMMU compatible strings to use nvidia,tegra264-smmu to enable
>> CMDQV support. Add device tree nodes for the CMDQV hardware and enable
>> them on the tegra264-p3834 platform where SMMUs are enabled. Each SMMU
>> instance is paired with its corresponding CMDQV instance via the
>> nvidia,cmdqv property.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi | 8 +++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>> index 06795c82427a..375d122b92fa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264-p3834.dtsi
>> @@ -26,5 +26,13 @@ iommu@...0000 {
>> iommu@...0000 {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>> +
>> + cmdqv@...0000 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>
> This needs to be ordered in the file according to its address.
Hi Jon, Thanks for the review.
cmdqv nodes follow same ordering as its corresponding iommu nodes.
I have added them immediately after corresponding iommu nodes.
Can you please check and see if it's fine? Same applies to your
similar comments below as well.
>
>> +
>> + cmdqv@...0000 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
>> index f137565da804..d8287b95221e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
>> @@ -3361,7 +3361,7 @@ bus@...0000000 {
>> <0x02 0x00000000 0xd0 0x00000000 0x08 0x80000000>; /*
>> ECAM, prefetchable memory, I/O */
>> smmu1: iommu@...0000 {
>> - compatible = "arm,smmu-v3";
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-smmu", "arm,smmu-v3";
>> reg = <0x00 0x5000000 0x0 0x200000>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 12 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> <GIC_SPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> @@ -3370,10 +3370,11 @@ smmu1: iommu@...0000 {
>> #iommu-cells = <1>;
>> dma-coherent;
>> + nvidia,cmdqv = <&cmdqv1>;
>> };
>> smmu2: iommu@...0000 {
>> - compatible = "arm,smmu-v3";
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-smmu", "arm,smmu-v3";
>> reg = <0x00 0x6000000 0x0 0x200000>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> @@ -3382,6 +3383,23 @@ smmu2: iommu@...0000 {
>> #iommu-cells = <1>;
>> dma-coherent;
>> + nvidia,cmdqv = <&cmdqv2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmdqv1: cmdqv@...0000 {
>
> Same here. Please order according to the address.
>
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-cmdqv";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + reg = <0x00 0x5200000 0x0 0x830000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 19 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmdqv2: cmdqv@...0000 {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-cmdqv";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + reg = <0x00 0x6200000 0x0 0x830000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> };
>> mc: memory-controller@...0000 {
>> @@ -3437,7 +3455,7 @@ emc: external-memory-controller@...0000 {
>> };
>> smmu0: iommu@...0000 {
>> - compatible = "arm,smmu-v3";
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-smmu", "arm,smmu-v3";
>> reg = <0x00 0xa000000 0x0 0x200000>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> @@ -3446,10 +3464,11 @@ smmu0: iommu@...0000 {
>> #iommu-cells = <1>;
>> dma-coherent;
>> + nvidia,cmdqv = <&cmdqv0>;
>> };
>> smmu4: iommu@...0000 {
>> - compatible = "arm,smmu-v3";
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-smmu", "arm,smmu-v3";
>> reg = <0x00 0xb000000 0x0 0x200000>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> @@ -3458,6 +3477,23 @@ smmu4: iommu@...0000 {
>> #iommu-cells = <1>;
>> dma-coherent;
>> + nvidia,cmdqv = <&cmdqv4>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmdqv0: cmdqv@...0000 {
>
> And here.
>
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-cmdqv";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + reg = <0x00 0xa200000 0x0 0x830000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmdqv4: cmdqv@...0000 {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-cmdqv";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + reg = <0x00 0xb200000 0x0 0x830000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> };
>> i2c14: i2c@...0000 {
>> @@ -3690,7 +3726,7 @@ bus@...0000000 {
>> ranges = <0x00 0x00000000 0x88 0x00000000 0x01 0x00000000>;
>> smmu3: iommu@...0000 {
>> - compatible = "arm,smmu-v3";
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-smmu", "arm,smmu-v3";
>> reg = <0x00 0x6000000 0x0 0x200000>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 225 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>> <GIC_SPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> @@ -3699,6 +3735,15 @@ smmu3: iommu@...0000 {
>> #iommu-cells = <1>;
>> dma-coherent;
>> + nvidia,cmdqv = <&cmdqv3>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cmdqv3: cmdqv@...0000 {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-cmdqv";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + reg = <0x00 0x6200000 0x0 0x830000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 232 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> };
>> hda@...0000 {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists