linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add HINLINK H28K

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f27dc5ef-1c60-4724-8e18-33bbc4230d3e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:12:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add HINLINK H28K

On 01/12/2025 11:00, Chukun Pan wrote:
> The HINLINK H28K is a dual-gigabit SBC based on the RK3528 SoC.
> Add devicetree binding documentation for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> index d496421dbd87..8d6e2b28e51a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> @@ -718,6 +718,11 @@ properties:
>            - const: hardkernel,odroid-m2
>            - const: rockchip,rk3588s
>  
> +      - description: HINLINK H28K
> +        items:
> +          - const: hinlink,h28k
> +          - const: rockchip,rk3528
> +

Just squash these two binding patches. Way too much churn. Anyway, looks
like duplicate - two devices with same model name. You have entire
commit msg to explain that.

Best regards,
Krzysztof