[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251201105011.19386-6-phasta@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:50:08 +0100
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked()
Xe is one of the few users utilizing the return code of
dma_fence_signal() to check whether a fence had already been signaled by
someone else.
To clean up and simplify the dma_fence API, the few kernel users relying
on that behavior shall be ported to an alternative function.
Replace dma_fence_signal_locked() with
dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked().
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_fence.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_fence.c
index b2a0c46dfcd4..f6057456e460 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_fence.c
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ void xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(struct xe_hw_fence_irq *irq)
{
struct xe_hw_fence *fence, *next;
unsigned long flags;
- int err;
bool tmp;
if (XE_WARN_ON(!list_empty(&irq->pending))) {
@@ -93,9 +92,8 @@ void xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(struct xe_hw_fence_irq *irq)
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next, &irq->pending, irq_link) {
list_del_init(&fence->irq_link);
- err = dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->dma);
+ XE_WARN_ON(dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked(&fence->dma));
dma_fence_put(&fence->dma);
- XE_WARN_ON(err);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->lock, flags);
dma_fence_end_signalling(tmp);
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists