[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251201122406.105045-5-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:24:01 +0100
From: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
To: kees@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...raber.org>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/6] seccomp: handle multiple listeners case
If we have more than one listener in the tree and lower listener
wants us to continue syscall (SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE)
we must consult with upper listeners first, otherwise it is a
clear seccomp restrictions bypass scenario.
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...raber.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index ded3f6a6430b..ad733f849e0f 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -450,6 +450,9 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
ret = cur_ret;
matches->n = 1;
matches->filters[0] = f;
+ } else if ((ACTION_ONLY(cur_ret) == ACTION_ONLY(ret)) &&
+ ACTION_ONLY(cur_ret) == SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF) {
+ matches->filters[matches->n++] = f;
}
}
return ret;
@@ -1362,8 +1365,17 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
return 0;
case SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF:
- if (seccomp_do_user_notification(match, &sd))
- goto skip;
+ for (unsigned char i = 0; i < matches.n; i++) {
+ match = matches.filters[i];
+ /*
+ * If userspace wants us to skip this syscall, do so.
+ * But if userspace wants to continue syscall, we
+ * must consult with the upper-level filters listeners
+ * and act accordingly.
+ */
+ if (seccomp_do_user_notification(match, &sd))
+ goto skip;
+ }
return 0;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists