linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence-quadspi: Fix cqspi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7ccef20-a490-45cf-9e55-16c9b2e01f44@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:06:49 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
Cc: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, a-dutta@...com,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, srk@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence-quadspi: Fix cqspi_probe() error handling
 for runtime pm

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 08:28:44AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 08:53:53PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:

> > Commit f1eb4e792bb1 ("spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: Enable pm runtime earlier
> > to avoid imbalance") relocated code but missed updating the error handling
> > path associated with it.

> Our CI just hit this WARNING with 6.18 kernel, on verdin-am62. To me it's a
> regression from v6.18, specifically from spi-fix-v6.18-rc7, we did not
> had any such WARNING with the master build we did run last Friday.

Does this fix the issues you're seeing:

    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251130091251.12120-1-alitariq45892@gmail.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)