lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <692d978b.170a0220.b1da0.297a@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:26:32 +0800
From: Hsiu Che Yu <yu.whisper.personal@...il.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc: Hsiu Che Yu <yu.whisper.personal@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: num: bounded: add safety comment for Bounded::__new

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 10:12:27AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>I disagree. For the same reasons as str::from_utf8_unchecked, this
>should also be unsafe. It creates a value that violates invariants,
>which may be used to trigger UB combined with other safe code.
>
>Alice

I understand. Once the caller passes a value that cannot be represented 
with N bits, the type invariant is violated. Keeping this function safe 
could allow callers to overlook this critical requirement.

Thank you for the feedback. I will submit v2 with the necessary changes 
and improved documentation.

Best regards,
Hsiu Che Yu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ