lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78a9384c-7a1d-43b7-a16f-d0bc6863fd1e@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:27:49 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, yangxingui <yangxingui@...wei.com>,
	<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <liyihang9@...artners.com>, <liuyonglong@...wei.com>,
	<kangfenglong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "scsi: libsas: Fix exp-attached device scan after
 probe failure scanned in again after probe failed"

在 2025/12/1 20:51, John Garry 写道:
> On 27/11/2025 07:27, yangxingui wrote:
>> Hi, John
>>
>> I'm glad to receive your reply.
>>
>> On 2025/11/27 14:47, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 27/11/2025 00:59, yangxingui wrote:
>>>> Kindly ping for upstream.
>>>>
>>>> On 2025/10/21 15:34, Xingui Yang wrote:
>>>
>>> Your reasons for revert is light on details.
>>>
>>>>> This reverts commit ab2068a6fb84751836a84c26ca72b3beb349619d.
>>>>>
>>>>> As the disk may fall into an abnormal loop of probe when it fails 
>>>>> to probe
>>>>> due to physical reasons and cannot be repaired.
>>>
>>> So for a faulty disk we get into a indefinite loop, right?
>> Yes, because a hard reset for SATA disk is executed during the error 
>> handler, a BC event will be received after the disk probe fails, and 
>> the probe will be re-executed on the disk.
> 
> You need to add these details to the commit log.
> 
>>>
>>> What about case where this was helping before?
>> A temporary fault injected into the disk or link, which can be 
>> recovered after a short time.
> 
> I'm ok with this if Jason is...

I think we can merge this patch first and fix the previous issue later 
because this issue is more critical. So:

Reviewed-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ