[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4fa1bd2-70fd-4450-a3f5-e3edf38d2b53@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:01:51 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, "Maciej
Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman
<peternewman@...gle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin
<Dave.Martin@....com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain create/remove
using struct rdt_domain_hdr
Hi Tony,
On 11/24/25 10:53 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Up until now, all monitoring events were associated with the L3 resource and it
> made sense to use the L3 specific "struct rdt_mon_domain *" argument to functions
> operating on domains.
>
> Telemetry events will be tied to a new resource with its instances represented
> by a new domain structure that, just like struct rdt_mon_domain, starts with
> the generic struct rdt_domain_hdr.
>
> Prepare to support domains belonging to different resources by changing the
> calling convention of functions operating on domains. Pass the generic header
> and use that to find the domain specific structure where needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists