linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] bus: fsl-mc: Convert to bus callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <crbruv2pp24ljufun5ki3ow3ips326tpuitxch464b2iuhwwem@i2yf5wynizvl>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:07:48 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bus: fsl-mc: Convert to bus callbacks

Hello Greg,

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 03:48:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 03:09:20PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > With the eventual goal to drop .probe(), .remove() and .shutdown() from
> > struct device_driver, convert the fsl bus to use bus methods.
> 
> We can drop those functions?  Ok, that would be nice, didn't realize it
> would be possible!

I think we discussed that some time ago when I tackled making the
remove callbacks return void. When I said I want to make
device_driver->remove also return void I think it was you who said
to better convert the users to bus functions. So that's me doing what
you said :-)

I wonder what the merge plan for this series is. The last changes to
drivers/fsl-mc were merged by Christophe Leroy (added to Cc:)

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)