[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <zfwk7bzznjhnkqmfvfn3tan7vdwzybghf5inwci5kbqlhuixwp@2cktlvdv4gjg>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:49:30 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>, David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Fix stack overflow in validate_branch()
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 05:20:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On an allmodconfig kernel compiled with Clang, objtool is segfaulting in
> > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla2xxx.o due to a stack overflow in
> > validate_branch().
> >
> > Due in part to KASAN being enabled, the qla2xxx code has a large number
> > of conditional jumps, causing objtool to go quite deep in its recursion.
> >
> > By far the biggest offender of stack usage is the recently added
> > 'prev_state' stack variable in validate_insn(), coming in at 328 bytes.
>
> That's weird - how can a user-space tool run into stack
> limits, are they set particularly conservatively?
On my Fedora system, "ulimit -s" is 8MB. You'd think that would be
enough :-)
In this case, objtool had over 20,000 stack frames caused by recursively
following over 7,000(!) conditional jumps in a single function.
> In any case, applied to tip:objtool/urgent, thanks!
Looks good now, thanks for fixing that up!
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists