lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251202-pwm_safe_register-v2-1-7a2e0d1e287f@posteo.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 18:17:52 +0000
From: Markus Probst <markus.probst@...teo.de>
To: Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, 
 Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, 
 Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, 
 Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, 
 Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
 Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
 Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
 Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
 Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
 Markus Probst <markus.probst@...teo.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rust: pwm: Add UnregisteredChip wrapper around Chip

The `pwm::Registration::register` function provides no guarantee that the
function isn't called twice with the same pwm chip, which is considered
unsafe.

Add `pwm::UnregisteredChip` as wrapper around `pwm::Chip`.
Implement `pwm::UnregisteredChip::register` for the registration. This
function takes ownership of `pwm::UnregisteredChip` and therefore
guarantees that the registration can't be called twice on the same pwm
chip.

Signed-off-by: Markus Probst <markus.probst@...teo.de>
---
This patch provides the additional guarantee that the pwm chip doesn't
get registered twice.

The following changes were made:
- change the visibility of `pwm::Registration` to private
- remove the `pwm::Registration::register` function
- add `pwm::UnregisteredChip` - a wrapper around `pwm::Chip`
- return `pwm::UnregisteredChip` in `pwm::Chip::new`
- add `pwm::UnregisteredChip::register` for registering the pwm chip
  once
- add Send + Sync bounds to `PwmOps`

Note that I wasn't able to test this patch, due to the lack of hardware.

Also I was not able to successfully compile drivers/pwm/pwm_th1520.rs,
as `clk::Clk` seems to be missing. I haven't found the missing patch
in linux-next nor in

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git/log/?h=pwm/for-next

(the tree in which the th1520 pwm driver was merged).
So please verify yourself that the driver compiles and throws no errors.
---
Changes in v2:
- use the `pwm::UnregisteredChip` wrapper instead of moving the
  registration into `pwm::Chip::new` to allow access to the chip prior
  to the registration
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251127-pwm_safe_register-v1-1-d22d0ed068ac@posteo.de
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm_th1520.rs |  2 +-
 rust/kernel/pwm.rs        | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm_th1520.rs b/drivers/pwm/pwm_th1520.rs
index 955c359b07fb..65a52b6620ab 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm_th1520.rs
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm_th1520.rs
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ fn probe(
             }),
         )?;
 
-        pwm::Registration::register(dev, chip)?;
+        chip.register()?;
 
         Ok(KBox::new(Th1520PwmPlatformDriver, GFP_KERNEL)?.into())
     }
diff --git a/rust/kernel/pwm.rs b/rust/kernel/pwm.rs
index cb00f8a8765c..bf7515d04d8a 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/pwm.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/pwm.rs
@@ -15,7 +15,11 @@
     prelude::*,
     types::{ARef, AlwaysRefCounted, Opaque}, //
 };
-use core::{marker::PhantomData, ptr::NonNull};
+use core::{
+    marker::PhantomData,
+    ops::Deref,
+    ptr::NonNull, //
+};
 
 /// Represents a PWM waveform configuration.
 /// Mirrors struct [`struct pwm_waveform`](srctree/include/linux/pwm.h).
@@ -173,7 +177,7 @@ pub struct RoundedWaveform<WfHw> {
 }
 
 /// Trait defining the operations for a PWM driver.
-pub trait PwmOps: 'static + Sized {
+pub trait PwmOps: 'static + Send + Sync + Sized {
     /// The driver-specific hardware representation of a waveform.
     ///
     /// This type must be [`Copy`], [`Default`], and fit within `PWM_WFHWSIZE`.
@@ -584,11 +588,12 @@ unsafe fn bound_parent_device(&self) -> &device::Device<Bound> {
     ///
     /// Returns an [`ARef<Chip>`] managing the chip's lifetime via refcounting
     /// on its embedded `struct device`.
-    pub fn new(
-        parent_dev: &device::Device,
+    #[allow(clippy::new_ret_no_self)]
+    pub fn new<'a>(
+        parent_dev: &'a device::Device<Bound>,
         num_channels: u32,
         data: impl pin_init::PinInit<T, Error>,
-    ) -> Result<ARef<Self>> {
+    ) -> Result<UnregisteredChip<'a, T>> {
         let sizeof_priv = core::mem::size_of::<T>();
         // SAFETY: `pwmchip_alloc` allocates memory for the C struct and our private data.
         let c_chip_ptr_raw =
@@ -623,7 +628,9 @@ pub fn new(
         // SAFETY: `chip_ptr_as_self` points to a valid `Chip` (layout-compatible with
         // `bindings::pwm_chip`) whose embedded device has refcount 1.
         // `ARef::from_raw` takes this pointer and manages it via `AlwaysRefCounted`.
-        Ok(unsafe { ARef::from_raw(NonNull::new_unchecked(chip_ptr_as_self)) })
+        let chip = unsafe { ARef::from_raw(NonNull::new_unchecked(chip_ptr_as_self)) };
+
+        Ok(UnregisteredChip { chip, parent_dev })
     }
 }
 
@@ -654,37 +661,29 @@ unsafe fn dec_ref(obj: NonNull<Chip<T>>) {
 // structure's state is managed and synchronized by the kernel's device model
 // and PWM core locking mechanisms. Therefore, it is safe to move the `Chip`
 // wrapper (and the pointer it contains) across threads.
-unsafe impl<T: PwmOps + Send> Send for Chip<T> {}
+unsafe impl<T: PwmOps> Send for Chip<T> {}
 
 // SAFETY: It is safe for multiple threads to have shared access (`&Chip`) because
 // the `Chip` data is immutable from the Rust side without holding the appropriate
 // kernel locks, which the C core is responsible for. Any interior mutability is
 // handled and synchronized by the C kernel code.
-unsafe impl<T: PwmOps + Sync> Sync for Chip<T> {}
+unsafe impl<T: PwmOps> Sync for Chip<T> {}
 
-/// A resource guard that ensures `pwmchip_remove` is called on drop.
-///
-/// This struct is intended to be managed by the `devres` framework by transferring its ownership
-/// via [`devres::register`]. This ties the lifetime of the PWM chip registration
-/// to the lifetime of the underlying device.
-pub struct Registration<T: PwmOps> {
+/// A wrapper arround `ARef<Chip<T>>` that ensures that `register` can only be called once.
+pub struct UnregisteredChip<'a, T: PwmOps> {
     chip: ARef<Chip<T>>,
+    parent_dev: &'a device::Device<Bound>,
 }
 
-impl<T: 'static + PwmOps + Send + Sync> Registration<T> {
+impl<T: PwmOps> UnregisteredChip<'_, T> {
     /// Registers a PWM chip with the PWM subsystem.
     ///
     /// Transfers its ownership to the `devres` framework, which ties its lifetime
     /// to the parent device.
     /// On unbind of the parent device, the `devres` entry will be dropped, automatically
     /// calling `pwmchip_remove`. This function should be called from the driver's `probe`.
-    pub fn register(dev: &device::Device<Bound>, chip: ARef<Chip<T>>) -> Result {
-        let chip_parent = chip.device().parent().ok_or(EINVAL)?;
-        if dev.as_raw() != chip_parent.as_raw() {
-            return Err(EINVAL);
-        }
-
-        let c_chip_ptr = chip.as_raw();
+    pub fn register(self) -> Result<ARef<Chip<T>>> {
+        let c_chip_ptr = self.chip.as_raw();
 
         // SAFETY: `c_chip_ptr` points to a valid chip with its ops initialized.
         // `__pwmchip_add` is the C function to register the chip with the PWM core.
@@ -692,12 +691,33 @@ pub fn register(dev: &device::Device<Bound>, chip: ARef<Chip<T>>) -> Result {
             to_result(bindings::__pwmchip_add(c_chip_ptr, core::ptr::null_mut()))?;
         }
 
-        let registration = Registration { chip };
+        let registration = Registration {
+            chip: ARef::clone(&self.chip),
+        };
+
+        devres::register(self.parent_dev, registration, GFP_KERNEL)?;
 
-        devres::register(dev, registration, GFP_KERNEL)
+        Ok(self.chip)
     }
 }
 
+impl<T: PwmOps> Deref for UnregisteredChip<'_, T> {
+    type Target = Chip<T>;
+
+    fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
+        &self.chip
+    }
+}
+
+/// A resource guard that ensures `pwmchip_remove` is called on drop.
+///
+/// This struct is intended to be managed by the `devres` framework by transferring its ownership
+/// via [`devres::register`]. This ties the lifetime of the PWM chip registration
+/// to the lifetime of the underlying device.
+struct Registration<T: PwmOps> {
+    chip: ARef<Chip<T>>,
+}
+
 impl<T: PwmOps> Drop for Registration<T> {
     fn drop(&mut self) {
         let chip_raw = self.chip.as_raw();

---
base-commit: fae00ea9f00367771003ace78f29549dead58fc7
change-id: 20251127-pwm_safe_register-e49b0a261101


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ