linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: proximity: Add RF Digital RFD77402 ToF sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHc1_P7_3eBvSSm5JX4Mvuy-49Wqx2y7RuX1bbTvhCo+OGWpcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 08:45:19 +0530
From: Shrikant <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, 
	neil.armstrong@...aro.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 
	david.hunter.linux@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: iio: proximity: Add RF Digital
 RFD77402 ToF sensor

On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 1:36 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 30/11/2025 16:37, Shrikant Raskar wrote:
> > The RF Digital RFD77402 is a Time-of-Flight (ToF) proximity and distance
> > sensor that provides absolute and highly accurate distance measurements
> > from 100 mm up to 2000 mm over an I²C interface. It includes an optional
> > interrupt pin that signals when new measurement data is ready.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Fix patch heading
> > - Fix commit message
> > - Remove '|' from description
> > - Update interrupt description
> > - Add 'vdd-supply' to required
>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
>
>
> <form letter>
> This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
> are being ignored. If you know the process, just skip it entirely
> (please do not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions
> intended, no patronizing, I just want to avoid wasted efforts). If you
> do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
> list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...'). However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
>
> Full context and explanation:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L591
> </form letter>
Thank you for reviewing the patch.

Regards,
Shrikant