[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aS9MTGx6V6VacZeH@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 23:30:04 +0300
From: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@...yun.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob
> > - for (pos = 0; pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE; pos += len) {
> > - struct nvme_ns_id_desc *cur = data + pos;
> > + pos = 0;
> > + do {
> > + } while (pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE - sizeof(*cur));
> I don't want bikeshed this, but I thought this looked better as a
> for-loop. You can just modify the continuing condition instead of
> changing the loop type to do-while.
OK, tried to make the patch as close as possible to previous code.
See v4.
Also, adding 'pos += len' to modified `for` makes the line longer
than 80 symbols. However, checkpatch.pl says it is OK. Let me know
if it should be fixed somehow (e.g. by moving 'pos += len' to the
end of loop compound statement).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists