[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aS9UWDA4jABUWB+W@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:04:24 -0800
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
CC: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>, Sumit Semwal
<sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>, Christian
König <christian.koenig@....com>, Felix Kuehling
<Felix.Kuehling@....com>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, "David
Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@...el.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked()
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:47:39PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> > > @@ -93,9 +92,8 @@ void xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(struct xe_hw_fence_irq *irq)
> > > spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->lock, flags);
> > > list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next, &irq->pending, irq_link) {
> > > list_del_init(&fence->irq_link);
> > > - err = dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->dma);
> > > + XE_WARN_ON(dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked(&fence->dma));
> >
> > I think XE_WARN_ON can compile out in certain builds. Best to leave warn on logic as is.
>
> I don't think XE_WARN_ON compiles out. It should always evaluate
> the content, then, depending on the build, it prints debug logs.
Ah, ok. I thought XE_WARN_ON was tied to a Kconfig to compile out or
WARN_ON (this is what XE_WARN_ON resolves) compiled out in some kernel
builds. Upon more looking, I guess neither of these is the case.
So I guess this patch is actually:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
Sorry for the noise. Side note, we should probably just XE_WARN_ON too
since this is just WARN_ON.
Matt
>
> Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists