linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: talos-evk: Add support for QCS615 talos evk board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO9ioeUVx_qf3no9aLgZ3OQQPQ7nG-2aTx8SHaEN5DUf02USWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 23:06:28 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: tessolveupstream@...il.com
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: talos-evk: Add support for
 QCS615 talos evk board

On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 at 12:16, <tessolveupstream@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 14-11-2025 01:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:27:35PM +0530, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:

> >> +
> >> +&uart0 {
> >> +    status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +&usb_1_hsphy {
> >> +    vdd-supply = <&vreg_l5a>;
> >> +    vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
> >> +    vdda-phy-dpdm-supply = <&vreg_l13a>;
> >> +
> >> +    status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +&usb_qmpphy {
> >> +    vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l5a>;
> >> +    vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l12a>;
> >> +
> >> +    status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +&usb_1 {
> >> +    status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +&usb_1_dwc3 {
> >> +    dr_mode = "host";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +&usb_hsphy_2 {
> >
> > So, the labels are usb_1_hsphy, but usb_hsphy_2? That's not logical,
> > please fix one of them. Then please fix the order of nodes here.
>
> The node names come directly from the included talos.dtsi, where they
> are defined as usb_1_hsphy & usb_hsphy_2.
> To avoid breaking inherited definitions, we kept the same labels
> in our board DTS.

Please fix them in the base DT.

> However, I will reorder the nodes so they appear in a logical and
> consistent sequence.

This is a prerequisite, no questions.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry