[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc01a71c-2245-4c2d-a7d2-e79c61a6d3f3@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 09:12:39 +0530
From: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <mukesh.savaliya@....qualcomm.com>,
Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, psodagud@...cinc.com, djaggi@...cinc.com,
quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com, quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com,
quic_arandive@...cinc.com, quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com,
Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Describe SA8255p
Hi Krzysztof,
On 11/26/2025 10:32 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 11/22/2025 5:10 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 10:30:13AM +0530, Praveen Talari wrote:
>>> + dmas:
>>> + maxItems: 2
>>> +
>>> + dma-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: tx
>>> + - const: rx
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + power-domains:
>>> + minItems: 2
>>
>> Drop
>>
>>> + maxItems: 2
>>> +
>>> + power-domain-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: power
>>> + - const: perf
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - interrupts
>>> + - power-domains
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>
>> So common SE properties are not applicable? If so explain why in the
>> commit msg.
>>
>>> + - $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> +
>>> + i2c@...000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,sa8255p-geni-i2c";
>>> + reg = <0xa90000 0x4000>;
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 357 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + power-domains = <&scmi0_pd 0>, <&scmi0_dvfs 0>;
>>> + power-domain-names = "power", "perf";
>>
>> dmas and dma-names
>
> For this platform (all Auto targets), we primarily use FIFO/CPU_DMA mode
> rather than GSI mode, and these are not defined in the Device Tree file
> as well now. Should we still include the dmas and dma-names properties
> in the example node?
Would you mind confirming this?
Thanks,
Praveen
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists