linux-kernel - Re: test-by-test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <371e1dcd-c18d-49db-a45c-e8cc7ec147f8@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:46:13 +0800
From: Yin Li <yin.li@....qualcomm.com>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_okukatla@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: test-by-test



On 12/2/2025 3:13 PM, Yin Li wrote:
> Hi Georgi,
> 
> on 16 May 2025 18:50:15 +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>  >Hi Mike,
>  >...
>  >
>  >> To prevent this priority inversion, switch to using rt_mutex for
>  >> icc_bw_lock. This isn't needed for icc_lock since that's not used in 
> the
>  >> critical, latency-sensitive voting paths.
>  >
>  >If the issue does not occur anymore with this patch, then this is a good
>  >sign, but we still need to get some numbers and put them in the commit
>  >message.
>...


Hi all,

I'm sorry,I realized that the previous patch I sent was incorrect due to 
an email sending mistake.

Please NAK the previous patch, I will resend a corrected version shortly.

Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you for your understanding.



-- 
Thx and BRs,
Yin