linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Defer throttle when task exits to user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20251202120129.GA3428753@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:01:29 +0800
From: "Aaron Lu" <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
To: "Florian Bezdeka" <florian.bezdeka@...mens.com>
Cc: "bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>, 
	"vschneid@...hat.com" <vschneid@...hat.com>, 
	"xii@...gle.com" <xii@...gle.com>, 
	"chengming.zhou@...ux.dev" <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>, 
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	"joshdon@...gle.com" <joshdon@...gle.com>, 
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, 
	"kprateek.nayak@....com" <kprateek.nayak@....com>, 
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	"bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, 
	"yu.c.chen@...el.com" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, 
	"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, 
	"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"mkoutny@...e.com" <mkoutny@...e.com>, 
	"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>, 
	"zhouchuyi@...edance.com" <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>,  "Kiszka, 
	          Jan" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, 
	"liusongtang@...edance.com" <liusongtang@...edance.com>, 
	"matteo.martelli@...ethink.co.uk" <matteo.martelli@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Defer throttle when task exits to user

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 11:09:48AM +0100, Florian Bezdeka wrote:
> So you backported the entire logic back to older releases already. Wow.
> Would 6.1 be possible as well, or any other blockers ahead? Asking
> because 6.1 is the baseline for the affected systems.
>

Yes I think 6.1 is possible.

> I think 6.12 should be doable with the patches mentioned above (your
> comments included). If your backport would help us to come down to 6.1
> that would be even better.

I attached the patches for 5.15 tree for your reference, hope it's useful.

Best wishes,
Aaron
Download attachment "backport_5.15.tar.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (27674 bytes)