[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bp6dxqsfa66txee3b7kzqgj2hgzow6ukvffczn2fz43kn53prv@2zlw65irjsc6>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:51:42 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: objtool/urgent] objtool: Consolidate annotation macros
On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 09:44:45AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 at 09:21, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > It *feels* like this should just all be
> >
> > 911: .pushsection .discard.annotate_insn ; .long 911b - .; .long 1; .popsection
> > jmp __x86_return_thunk
> >
> > instead.
>
> Actually, I think it should just be
>
> 911: jmp __x86_return_thunk
> .pushsection .discard.annotate_insn ; .long 911b - . , 1; .popsection
>
> but again: it's entirely possible that there's something I am missing.
Indeed, we can combine the longs (though see my other email for the
explanation about the mergeable thing).
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists