[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ae795e6b-bf65-46ec-9629-edcec3dcd0b9@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:00:44 -0500
From: "Chuck Lever" <cel@...nel.org>
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@...nel.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"Alexander Aring" <alex.aring@...il.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>, NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>,
"Olga Kornievskaia" <okorniev@...hat.com>, "Dai Ngo" <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
"Tom Talpey" <tom@...pey.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] filelock: allow lease_managers to dictate what qualifies as a
conflict
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025, at 10:08 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Requesting a delegation on a file from the userland fcntl() interface
> currently succeeds when there are conflicting opens present.
>
> This is because the lease handling code ignores conflicting opens for
> FL_LAYOUT and FL_DELEG leases. This was a hack put in place long ago,
> because nfsd already checks for conflicts in its own way. The kernel
> needs to perform this check for userland delegations the same way it is
> done for leases, however.
>
> Make this dependent on the lease_manager by adding a new
> ->lm_open_conflict() lease_manager operation and have
> generic_add_lease() call that instead of check_conflicting_open().
> Morph check_conflicting_open() into a ->lm_open_conflict() op that is
> only called for userland leases/delegations. Set the
> ->lm_open_conflict() operations for nfsd to trivial functions that
> always return 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst | 1 +
> fs/locks.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 11 ++++-
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 7 +++
> include/linux/filelock.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> index
> 77704fde98457423beae7ff00525a7383e37132b..29d453a2201bcafa03b26b706e4c68eaf5683829
> 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
> @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ lm_change yes no no
> lm_breaker_owns_lease: yes no no
> lm_lock_expirable yes no no
> lm_expire_lock no no yes
> +lm_open_conflict yes no no
> ====================== ============= ================= =========
>
> buffer_head
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index
> e974f8e180fe48682a271af4f143e6bc8e9c4d3b..a58c51c2cdd0cc4496538ed54d063cd523264128
> 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -585,10 +585,50 @@ lease_setup(struct file_lease *fl, void **priv)
> __f_setown(filp, task_pid(current), PIDTYPE_TGID, 0);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * lease_open_conflict - see if the given file points to an inode that has
> + * an existing open that would conflict with the
> + * desired lease.
> + * @filp: file to check
> + * @arg: type of lease that we're trying to acquire
> + *
> + * Check to see if there's an existing open fd on this file that would
> + * conflict with the lease we're trying to set.
> + */
> +static int
> +lease_open_conflict(struct file *filp, const int arg)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> + int self_wcount = 0, self_rcount = 0;
> +
> + if (arg == F_RDLCK)
> + return inode_is_open_for_write(inode) ? -EAGAIN : 0;
> + else if (arg != F_WRLCK)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure that only read/write count is from lease requestor.
> + * Note that this will result in denying write leases when i_writecount
> + * is negative, which is what we want. (We shouldn't grant write leases
> + * on files open for execution.)
> + */
> + if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
> + self_wcount = 1;
> + else if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ)
> + self_rcount = 1;
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) != self_wcount ||
> + atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount) != self_rcount)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct lease_manager_operations lease_manager_ops = {
> .lm_break = lease_break_callback,
> .lm_change = lease_modify,
> .lm_setup = lease_setup,
> + .lm_open_conflict = lease_open_conflict,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1753,52 +1793,6 @@ int fcntl_getdeleg(struct file *filp, struct
> delegation *deleg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * check_conflicting_open - see if the given file points to an inode
> that has
> - * an existing open that would conflict with the
> - * desired lease.
> - * @filp: file to check
> - * @arg: type of lease that we're trying to acquire
> - * @flags: current lock flags
> - *
> - * Check to see if there's an existing open fd on this file that would
> - * conflict with the lease we're trying to set.
> - */
> -static int
> -check_conflicting_open(struct file *filp, const int arg, int flags)
> -{
> - struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> - int self_wcount = 0, self_rcount = 0;
> -
> - if (flags & FL_LAYOUT)
> - return 0;
> - if (flags & FL_DELEG)
> - /* We leave these checks to the caller */
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (arg == F_RDLCK)
> - return inode_is_open_for_write(inode) ? -EAGAIN : 0;
> - else if (arg != F_WRLCK)
> - return 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Make sure that only read/write count is from lease requestor.
> - * Note that this will result in denying write leases when
> i_writecount
> - * is negative, which is what we want. (We shouldn't grant write
> leases
> - * on files open for execution.)
> - */
> - if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
> - self_wcount = 1;
> - else if (filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ)
> - self_rcount = 1;
> -
> - if (atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) != self_wcount ||
> - atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount) != self_rcount)
> - return -EAGAIN;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int
> generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, int arg, struct file_lease **flp,
> void **priv)
> {
> @@ -1835,7 +1829,7 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, int arg,
> struct file_lease **flp, void **pr
> percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
> spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> time_out_leases(inode, &dispose);
> - error = check_conflicting_open(filp, arg, lease->c.flc_flags);
> + error = lease->fl_lmops->lm_open_conflict(filp, arg);
> if (error)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -1892,7 +1886,7 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, int arg,
> struct file_lease **flp, void **pr
> * precedes these checks.
> */
> smp_mb();
> - error = check_conflicting_open(filp, arg, lease->c.flc_flags);
> + error = lease->fl_lmops->lm_open_conflict(filp, arg);
> if (error) {
> locks_unlink_lock_ctx(&lease->c);
> goto out;
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
> index
> 683bd1130afe298f9df774684192c89f68102b72..ca7ec7a022bd5c12fad60ff9e51145d9cca55527
> 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
> @@ -764,9 +764,16 @@ nfsd4_layout_lm_change(struct file_lease *onlist,
> int arg,
> return lease_modify(onlist, arg, dispose);
> }
>
> +static int
> +nfsd4_layout_lm_open_conflict(struct file *filp, int arg)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
The usual idiom for no-op callbacks is to make them optional.
Then generic_add_lease would check if the ->lm_open_conflict
callback is defined first and skip the call if it's not.
If that doesn't make sense to do, and these NFSD-specific
functions need to remain, then our usual practice is to add
a kdoc comment for both of the new functions that looks like
the one you added above for lease_open_conflict().
Otherwise, I'm comfortable that this change fits in with the
deadlock prevention patches we are considering for NFSD.
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
For both 1/2 and 2/2.
> static const struct lease_manager_operations nfsd4_layouts_lm_ops = {
> - .lm_break = nfsd4_layout_lm_break,
> - .lm_change = nfsd4_layout_lm_change,
> + .lm_break = nfsd4_layout_lm_break,
> + .lm_change = nfsd4_layout_lm_change,
> + .lm_open_conflict = nfsd4_layout_lm_open_conflict,
> };
>
> int
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index
> 8f8c9385101e15b64883eabec71775f26b14f890..669fabb095407e61525e5b71268cf1f06fc09877
> 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -5543,10 +5543,17 @@ nfsd_change_deleg_cb(struct file_lease *onlist,
> int arg,
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> +static int
> +nfsd4_deleg_lm_open_conflict(struct file *filp, int arg)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct lease_manager_operations nfsd_lease_mng_ops = {
> .lm_breaker_owns_lease = nfsd_breaker_owns_lease,
> .lm_break = nfsd_break_deleg_cb,
> .lm_change = nfsd_change_deleg_cb,
> + .lm_open_conflict = nfsd4_deleg_lm_open_conflict,
> };
>
> static __be32 nfsd4_check_seqid(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> struct nfs4_stateowner *so, u32 seqid)
> diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> index
> 54b824c05299261e6bd6acc4175cb277ea35b35d..2f5e5588ee0733c200103801d0d2ba19bebbf9af
> 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct lease_manager_operations {
> int (*lm_change)(struct file_lease *, int, struct list_head *);
> void (*lm_setup)(struct file_lease *, void **);
> bool (*lm_breaker_owns_lease)(struct file_lease *);
> + int (*lm_open_conflict)(struct file *, int);
> };
>
> struct lock_manager {
>
> --
> 2.52.0
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists