lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71a92d82-e941-4afe-a712-0a4d4c80ddfd@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:40:35 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
 hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org,
 sr@...dewatkins.com,
 "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/392] 5.15.197-rc1 review


On 03/12/2025 15:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.197 release.
> There are 392 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Dec 2025 15:23:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.197-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

...

> 
> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>      mm/mempool: fix poisoning order>0 pages with HIGHMEM


The above commit is causing the following build error ...

mm/mempool.c: In function ‘check_element’:
mm/mempool.c:68:17: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
    68 |                 for (int i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
       |                 ^~~
mm/mempool.c:68:17: note: use option ‘-std=c99’, ‘-std=gnu99’, ‘-std=c11’ or ‘-std=gnu11’ to compile your code
mm/mempool.c: In function ‘poison_element’:
mm/mempool.c:101:17: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
   101 |                 for (int i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
       |                 ^~~
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:289: mm/mempool.o] Error 1


Cheers,
Jon

-- 
nvpublic


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ