linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/300] 5.10.247-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eff6e790-08b2-49dd-b0fa-61d6e959cafb@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:49:20 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
 sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
 hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org,
 sr@...dewatkins.com,
 "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/300] 5.10.247-rc1 review


On 03/12/2025 15:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.247 release.
> There are 300 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Dec 2025 15:23:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.247-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

...
  
> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>      mm/mempool: fix poisoning order>0 pages with HIGHMEM
> 
> Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.maria.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>
>      mm/mempool: replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page()


The above two commits are causing the following build errors and
I needed to revert both ...

mm/mempool.c: In function ‘check_element’:
mm/mempool.c:68:17: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
    68 |                 for (int i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
       |                 ^~~
mm/mempool.c:68:17: note: use option ‘-std=c99’, ‘-std=gnu99’, ‘-std=c11’ or ‘-std=gnu11’ to compile your code
   CC      fs/open.o
mm/mempool.c:70:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kmap_local_page’; did you mean ‘kmap_to_page’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    70 |                         void *addr = kmap_local_page(page + i);
       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                                      kmap_to_page
mm/mempool.c:70:38: warning: initialisation of ‘void *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
mm/mempool.c:73:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunmap_local’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    73 |                         kunmap_local(addr);
       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/mempool.c: In function ‘poison_element’:
mm/mempool.c:101:17: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
   101 |                 for (int i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
       |                 ^~~
mm/mempool.c:103:38: warning: initialisation of ‘void *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
   103 |                         void *addr = kmap_local_page(page + i);
       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   CC      arch/arm/mach-tegra/pm-tegra20.o

Cheers,
Jon

-- 
nvpublic