linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix link error when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4eaccff9-a89d-4d0e-afbf-95e9996f9049@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 21:31:44 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Bean Huo" <beanhuo@...pp.de>, "kernel test robot" <lkp@...el.com>,
 avri.altman@...disk.com, "Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>,
 "Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, can.guo@....qualcomm.com,
 "Bean Huo" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix link error when CONFIG_RPMB=m

On Wed, Dec 3, 2025, at 17:23, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 15:39 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> However, the robot reported redefinition errors, which suggests that the
> header’s #else branch is being included while ufs-rpmb.c is also being compiled.
>
> I’m wondering if I’m missing something about the robot’s build logic.
>

It took me a while as well, but I found the link to the patch that
was tested now, as this was the one that changed IS_ENABLED()
to IS_BUILTIN(), and that went wrong with CONFIG_RPMB=m.

    Arnd