[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTCn_1VHOOkvhxpS@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:13:35 -0500
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
CC: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Gustavo Padovan
<gustavo@...ovan.org>, Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com>, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>, "Alex
Deucher" <alexander.deucher@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tursulin@...ulin.net>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Matthew Auld
<matthew.auld@...el.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/xe: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked()
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 01:04:24PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 09:47:39PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > > > @@ -93,9 +92,8 @@ void xe_hw_fence_irq_finish(struct xe_hw_fence_irq *irq)
> > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->lock, flags);
> > > > list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, next, &irq->pending, irq_link) {
> > > > list_del_init(&fence->irq_link);
> > > > - err = dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->dma);
> > > > + XE_WARN_ON(dma_fence_check_and_signal_locked(&fence->dma));
> > >
> > > I think XE_WARN_ON can compile out in certain builds. Best to leave warn on logic as is.
> >
> > I don't think XE_WARN_ON compiles out. It should always evaluate
> > the content, then, depending on the build, it prints debug logs.
>
> Ah, ok. I thought XE_WARN_ON was tied to a Kconfig to compile out or
> WARN_ON (this is what XE_WARN_ON resolves) compiled out in some kernel
> builds. Upon more looking, I guess neither of these is the case.
>
> So I guess this patch is actually:
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
and
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
if needed to merge through any other tree...
>
> Sorry for the noise. Side note, we should probably just XE_WARN_ON too
> since this is just WARN_ON.
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists